First of all, you have no proof BHO was born abroad.
You have NO PROOF his mother left the country before he was born. Since she was a minor up to shortly before his birth, she would have required the permission of her own parents to leave the USA.
There’s nothing in that statute that says anything about the age of the mother at the time of the birth of the child so your comment that “she was too young” to confer her own citizenship onto her child are ridiculous.
Birthers make thinking conservatives look stupid!
Really?
For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.
Birthers make thinking conservatives look stupid!
Who looks stupid? Afterbirthers that can't read.
Goodnight.
1. What's the big deal of parent's permission? All one needs IF asked is a piece of paper with the permission. Most all jurisdictions grant emancipation (status of majority) upon marriage, which Stanley Ann did in February 1961. Showing her marriage certificate should qualify her as able to leave the country. Who would you need to get permission from, your parents or spouse?
2. Stanley Ann Dunham turned 18 on November 29, 1960. The questionable time of here whereabouts begins after the end of 1959 Fall College Session, which ended after she was 18, and around the time she was married and emancipated.
3. Why has the state department stalled on an FOIA request for Stanley Ann Dunham's Passport records since November 2008? They admit they must produce them but they haven't yet. They can't stall forever.
And it doesn't matter a hoot in a hollar. His father, if his father is who he claims, was never a US Citizen, and thus he cannot be a Natural Born Citizen.