Posted on 01/03/2010 12:50:12 PM PST by Skepolitic
Spy chiefs turn on President Obama after seven CIA agents are slaughtered in Afghanistan By David Gardner
excerpt: Barack Obama was accused of double standards yesterday in his treatment of the CIA.
The President paid tribute to secret agents after seven of them were killed by a suicide bomber in Afghanistan. In a statement, he said the CIA had been ‘tested as never before’ and that agents had ‘served on the front lines in directly confronting the dangers of the 21st century’.
He lauded the victims as ‘part of a long line of patriots who have made great sacrifices for their fellow citizens and for our way of life’.
Yet the previous day he had blasted ‘systemic failures’ in the CIA and other US intelligence agencies for failing to prevent the Christmas Day syringe bomb attack.
‘One day the President is pointing the finger and blaming the intelligence services, saying there is a systemic failure,’ said one agency official. ‘Now we are heroes. The fact is that we are doing everything humanly possible to stay on top of the security situation. The deaths of our operatives shows just how involved we are on the ground.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1239941/Spy-chiefs-turn-President-Obama-seven-CIA-agents-slaughtered-Afghanistan.html#ixzz0baIEqJdD
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
To wish alongside them, for success -- fueled by any motivation -- is pretty f****d up, right there.
And I'm so excited to read how ST is going to prove me wrong using some convoluted logic.
Ummmm..., no, I think all that has happened is that you've shown you can't read... LOL...
Here's what I said...
Who would want the job to change your mind, when I see the depths of the troubles just from one post... LOL...
To wish alongside them, for success -- fueled by any motivation -- is pretty f****d up, right there.
You must have been "absent" when the Bush Administration said that it was a certainty that we're going to have a massive terrorist attack again, on the scale (if not more than) the 9/11 attacks.
And you must have been "absent" when we were told that it's not a matter of "if" but only a matter of "when" for this to happen.
And no one was saying that the Bush Administration was wishing them success for saying so. Not at all, they were speaking the reality of the situation.
You’re right...I can’t and WON’T read what you write.
Bye.....LOL!
it is chess game....it adds up to political management...he knows others know...when I was in the civil service, the elected politicians thought they ruled, but it was the civil servants that knew where the files were....play nice or we will stone-wall you.....
Well this just goes to show you that racial profiling really works. Because this bomber was a mussie he shoulld have been searched.
You’re right...I can’t and WON’T read what you write.
Well, the Islamic terrorists are gratified and I'm sure they would tell you that they wish to thank you for ignoring what they are trying to do here... LOL...
Nothing better could happen on Obama’s watch — in order to shake people’s thinking up, in regards to “Obama-think” — than to have a massive Islamic terrorist attack on the U.S., and bomb several U.S. cities with nukes...
The unbolded text, in blue, refers to your motivation.
The bolded text, in red, refers to your wishes.
That's pretty f****d up, right there.
Well this just goes to show you that racial profiling really works. Because this bomber was a mussie he shoulld have been searched.
Now I would agree with that 100%... with these Islamic terrorists. I'm glad someone gets it... but I'm also sure a lot of FReepers do get it anyway.
It's our own government who doesn't get it and unfortunately, neither did our own conservatives in the last administration get it.
The unbolded text, in blue, refers to your motivation.
You wish it did... except for the fact that it doesn't... LOL...
That's one problem that I've seen a number of FReepers have here on this board. It's an inability to talk about what "is" versus what they "wish it to be"...
Now, just like the Bush Administration, I spoke to what "is" -- and so did they. They told us that it's going to happen. Now, having said that, I don't know if you were saying to the Bush Admnistration that "they are showing their motivation" by them saying it's going to happen -- a certainty not a matter of "if" but a matter of "when"...
It's like I see a number of FReepers on this issue -- "You would be right, except for the fact you're wrong!"... LOL...
That's pretty f****d up, right there.
Then I would say it's about time to do something about Islam... :-)
I still believe I accurately ascertained your intent in your comments.
Either way -- if you meant it, or you posted very poorly, in such a way as to erroneously indicate you meant it -- it still is pretty f****d up, right there.
Everyone here has read for themselves exactly what you said. You can try to wiggle out of it all you want with your lengthy “but I really meant something else” posts. It doesn’t work and only makes you look ridiculous. Accusing others of alzheimers and poor reading comprehension when repeatedly showing your DIRECT quote is the sign of an idiot.
Buzz off.
It's pretty f****d up, right there.
Everyone here has read for themselves exactly what you said. You can try to wiggle out of it all you want with your lengthy “but I really meant something else” posts.
I think it's you who is making the "he meant something else" remark... LOL...
I've already said what was meant -- and you simply don't like hearing the reality of the situation. That's not my problem if you don't like the reality and certainty of the coming terrorist attack that the Bush Administration has made it clear that it's not a matter of "if" but a matter of "when"...
If you don't like the fact that it's going to happen -- then perhaps you better start doing something about Islam...
It's pretty f****d up, right there.
I hope that's not your only answer for the solution to the problem of the coming Islamic terrorist attack here....
I still believe I accurately ascertained your intent in your comments.
Except for the fact that I post otherwise... LOL...
That's my only response for those I expect to be allied with me, who either clumsily-and-accidently, or maliciously-and-purposefully cheer for my enemies.
Because if they did, that would be pretty f****d up, right there.
Seriously, and I’ve known you for a long time, dude: Seriously, check yourself. You are acting differently. It might be the sign of a medical issue. I am not taking a shot at you. I am mentioning this out of concern.
That's my only response for those I expect to be allied with me, who either clumsily-and-accidently, or maliciously-and-purposefully cheer for my enemies.
I'm not sure if I would want someone allied with me, fighting Islam and its accompanying terrorism as a tool in its war arsenal against the West -- with a limited comprehension like that...
But, that's okay if you stay in the trenches a ways down .... :-)
My reading comprehension is just fine, thank you very much.
How about you re-read what you wrote in post #11?
It’s despicable and aligns you with the “hopes” of the worst of the terrorists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.