To: kristinn
Quite honestly, she probably gets the crap for free or a cut rate. Designers do that for celebrities. And the stuff she wears is UGLY! She may need the bling fashion to make herself feel special. But it's still ugly.
15 posted on
12/29/2009 1:37:14 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: DJ MacWoW
Quite honestly, she probably gets the crap for free or a cut rate. Designers do that for celebrities. Nancy Reagan probably did, too and she still had to endure a lot of left wing venom over her wardrobe.
18 posted on
12/29/2009 1:40:01 PM PST by
Tamar1973
(Freedom of the Press?! I need Freedom FROM THE PRESS!)
To: DJ MacWoW
And the stuff she wears is UGLY! <<<<<
I noticed in a few recent magazines that weird belts are creeping into celebrity fashion pix, which is so funny. Only silly Hollywood-types would be enticed into copying Michelle’s belted look, it’s so bizarre. Some of them, to their credit, actually wear the belts at their waists, which Michelle apparently doesn’t believe in.
117 posted on
01/04/2010 10:23:34 PM PST by
Mjaye
To: DJ MacWoW
I don’t think as the First Lady she is allowed to take clothes..that’s considered gifts...I think they have to pay for everything they wear. I am going to try to find this out...be right back!
127 posted on
01/20/2010 9:28:34 PM PST by
Hildy
(This Christmas, the Democrats have given America the one gift that keeps on taking.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson