Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

That isn’t what I said at all.
All I said is -let’s be consistent.

All presidents get grief for problems that exist under their time in office.

We rightly give Obama grief for the whacky groupthink that exists underneath him.

I think the Bushies actually did quite well in preventing more attacks, so it was with disappointment when I learned of the Hasan situation and how PC thinking had infected our own military to the extreme that even an obviously crazed jihadist was “counseling” our soldiers.

This didn’t happen under Clinton - it happened under Bush.
Who do you think should receive the fallout for that?


219 posted on 12/28/2009 5:17:12 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: Scotswife

If we’re talking about the larger issue of mohammedans in the military, tell me what Bush might have done that would have reduced the risk posed by the likes of Hasan. Keep in mind, we were embarking on two campaigns against terror states and the war plan called for the cooperation of mohammedan opposition to those respective governments.

Just give me an example of something that should have been done. Something that Bush failed to do that might have prevented Hasan’s rampage.


229 posted on 12/28/2009 6:54:24 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson