Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freedomwarrior998

I saw the post he was commenting on and it is not in the same context as what you are saying.

“sneeze and I’ll blow your s#$% away” is what the supposed cop stated. That sounds like someone who shouldn’t have a gun let alone a badge.

The loon in this case didn’t decline any commands so use of deadly force would be murder.


22 posted on 12/28/2009 4:52:03 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver
The point is, if he HAD refused commands while holding a weapon, then deadly force would be authorized. Real life does not demand that an officer wait until a weapon is pointed in his direction before he can use deadly force.

If a suspect is holding a weapon and does not comply with commands, (IE: does anything other than what they are told) then deadly force would be permissible and expected. It wouldn't matter if the suspect were legally armed or not.

26 posted on 12/28/2009 4:59:45 AM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson