No answer to that will be forthcoming, no matter who asks, until it is ordered by Obama and Napolitano.
...which means it is damned unlikely!
You are probably right. In which case, we need to see that this story gets as much exposure as possible. And then we need to raise the question, why did security let this guy on board the plain without a passport? If they deny that story, then we need to ask, OK, let’s see the passport.
It’s all very well to blame the Dutch or the airline, but considering all the trouble security causes anyone who flies, it’s their responsibility to protect our country and its citizens from terrorists—especially from known terrorists.
Confiscate grandma’s toothpaste but let a known terrorist on board without a passport? And if they deny it, then where’s the passport?