To: TChris
Any conviction of a moving ban or target in Kalifornia requires notification. For example I have beaten many HOV lane tickets because the cop could not verify that I knew what time it was. I am part of the reason some HOV signs now have clocks and "In force" lights. ;-)
A burning ban would also require specific notification and proof that you knew a ban existed. I do not watch local news, I do not go to government websites, I do not listen to local radio. I was not aware there was a ban and the Government failed in it's obligation to notify me that the situation had changed by not calling me or sending me a letter. I have (had) no intention to break the ordinance nor did I do anything maliciously.
To: mad_as_he$$
Yeah, I ws wondering about that defense.
19 posted on
12/23/2009 8:26:59 AM PST by
Balding_Eagle
(Overproduction;, one of the five top worries of the American farmer.)
To: mad_as_he$$
Ignorance is not tolerated....
23 posted on
12/23/2009 8:47:13 AM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
To: mad_as_he$$
A burning ban would also require specific notification and proof that you knew a ban existed. I thought that ignorance of the law was not a valid defense.
24 posted on
12/23/2009 8:52:07 AM PST by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., hot enough down there today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson