Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Stupak: White House Pressuring Me to Keep Quiet on Abortion Language in Senate Health Bill
CNSNews.com ^ | 12-22-09 | Pete Winn

Posted on 12/23/2009 5:41:55 AM PST by FrdmLvr

CNSNews.com) - Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said the White House and the Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives have been pressuring him not to speak out on the "compromise" abortion language in the Senate version of the health care bill.

“They think I shouldn’t be expressing my views on this bill until they get a chance to try to sell me the language,” Stupak told CNSNews.com in an interview on Tuesday. “Well, I don’t need anyone to sell me the language. I can read it. I’ve seen it. I’ve worked with it. I know what it says. I don’t need to have a conference with the White House. I have the legislation in front of me here.”

The Michigan Democrat succeeded last month in getting 64 House Democrats to join him in attaching his pro-life amendment to the House version of the health-care bill. The “Stupak amendment,” as the provision is known, would prohibit the federal government from allocating taxpayer money to pay for any part of any health insurance plan that covers abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or when the life of the mother is in danger.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Will88
If they have real convictions, the Senate language on abortion will be changed significantly, or Obamacare won't pass the House again.

They already did vote nay when that Senate *compromise* language was a part of the House bill, for these pro-life Dems, it is the Hyde language, now to be called Stupak I suppose, or it is an end to this bill. Those 64 are on record, there is no way they can weasel, they know it, more importantly, their constituents know it, and unlike Nelson, all 64 will be up for re-election come November.

41 posted on 12/23/2009 9:22:00 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

Watching that townhall meeting on Youtube, I was struck with his matter-of-fact attitude. He forgets that We, the people did not send him to Versailles on the Potomac to vote the way he wants. He is there to do as he is told by We, the people. If he can’t perform that simple task, then he needs to find a new line of work.

Unfortunately, he is not well equipped for THAT profession, which he is most suited for.


42 posted on 12/23/2009 9:42:07 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

Don’t fall in love with this Stupak guy. He, like all the other Democrats who voted for this bill, are socialists. In the end I expect him to vote for a health care takeover whether or not it contains any language regarding abortion.


43 posted on 12/23/2009 11:07:05 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg
Those 64 are on record, there is no way they can weasel, they know it, more importantly, their constituents know it, and unlike Nelson, all 64 will be up for re-election come November.

I hope you're right. Yesterday, there was a thread where evidently there was video of Stupak saying if it came down to it, and his amendment was eliminated, that he might still vote for the bill. Didn't read that thread much, but that was the gist of it. But I hope most of the 64 will stick to their guns.

44 posted on 12/23/2009 1:39:49 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: grellis; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

Thanks grellis. Additional:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2413798/posts


45 posted on 12/23/2009 4:39:20 PM PST by SunkenCiv (My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Will88
Yesterday, there was a thread where evidently there was video of Stupak saying if it came down to it, and his amendment was eliminated, that he might still vote for the bill.

I just saw the video on this thread this morning: >> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2414422/posts?page=2 <<

I don't hear any indecision, I hear him say quite clearly that even if the Hyde language is not included, he will indeed vote for the final report, "I tried ... isn't that how America works?" He is a LIAR, for I have heard him say multiple times earlier, his own words that unless the Hyde language is included in the final conference report, he and his pro-life colleagues would kill the bill. What a dupe he's made of me, I have been all over this site for weeks now, promoting him and his tout, the creep.

He has doomed his seat. Unemployment is so much higher in Michigan than it is in the rest of the country -- come November, another schlub is gonna be looking for a job.

46 posted on 12/24/2009 6:34:03 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg

“He is a LIAR, for I have heard him say multiple times earlier, his own words that unless the Hyde language is included in the final conference report, he and his pro-life colleagues would kill the bill.”

Yep, all too many liars in Congress. And he was still posturing yesterday. I guess you’ve seen this statement from Stupak and the FR thread this morning:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2414245/posts

He says the Senate language is “unacceptable”, but never says what he’ll do if that language isn’t improved. In the end, Stupak might prove to have been one of the keys to passing Obamacare (if it passes) because of the number of Yes votes his efforts brought together for the initial 220 - 215 House vote.


47 posted on 12/24/2009 6:50:56 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson