[BluH2o]

I'm sure someone has already pointed this out ... the Katie Couric/Sarah Palin interview. The Charlie Gibson/Sarah Palin interview ... both over the top ‘get Sarah’ interviews by America liberal mainstream elitists. Sarah was only running for V/P on the McCain ticket ... yet she received far more scrutiny than BO. The reason ... she was considered a threat to the liberal medias already chosen one, the anointed one, the great one ... BO.

[Paul R.]

I might add, BTW, that right now there is a Yahoo news page about Pub State prosecutors looking to see if some of the “deals” in the Health Care bill can be whacked — not a bad article, actually. But on the right side of that page, there is a headline saying: “2009’s biggest scandals”, beside a picture of... Sarah Palin!?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091223/ap_on_re_us/us_health_care_deal_states

In the actual article you then go to, she is called controversial and “divisive”, and her resignation gets hit, but since when are those things 0.0000001% as “scandalous” as the deals that were made to pass this Health Care bill?

I don’t think one has to be a big Palin fan to be d*** angry about such distortion!

BTW, can someone capture, save to HD, and post that part of that page B4 it gets taken down or changed? (I have it saved, actually, but have no good way to post it.)