Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. regulator approves Oregon LNG terminal
Calgary Herald ^ | December 18, 2009 | Herald News Services

Posted on 12/21/2009 5:39:54 AM PST by thackney

The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on Thursday approved the $2.5-billion US Jordan Cove liquefi ed natural gas import terminal and related pipeline project that will help meet growing natural gas demand in the Pacific Northwest.

The terminal, to be located on Coos Bay in Oregon, would provide up to one billion cubic feet of gas a day. The 377-kilo-metre Pacific Connector pipeline that was also approved by the commission would transport the terminal's gas to the Oregon-California border.

The import terminal is owned by a subsidiary of Fort Chicago Energy Partners and the pipeline is a limited partnership between wholly owned subsidiaries of The Williams Companies Inc., PG&E Corp. and Fort Chicago.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: energy; lng; naturalgas

The proposed Oregon LNG Project will be located on the east side of the Skipanon channel on the Skipanon Peninsula in Warrenton, Oregon. The land is owned by Oregon Department of State Lands and leased to the Port of Astoria, which in turn has leased the land to Oregon LNG for 65 years. The 96-acre project site consists of a parcel of land located between the Skipanon Waterway and Youngs Bay.

The following is a quick summary of the Oregon LNG Project specifications:

Proposed Capacity: 1 BCF/day, expandable to 1.5 BCF/day
Tanks: 3 x 160,000 m3
Heat Source: Ambient air
C3+ Separation: Permitted on-site
Channel Depth: 43 ft. existing
Channel Width: 600 ft. existing
Berth: Up to 200,000 m3 ship; minimal dredging required
Site Location: 46 deg 10' 45" N; 123 deg 54' 25" W;
Site Control: 65-year lease of 96-acre site acquired
Local Jurisdiction: City of Warrenton
State and Local Permits: Local Oregon land use process completed

Oregon LNG
http://oregonlng.com

1 posted on 12/21/2009 5:39:57 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

I think there might be a little piping work in that project...


2 posted on 12/21/2009 5:43:29 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

Piping bump...


3 posted on 12/21/2009 5:44:45 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Eventually, if actually designed then built...


4 posted on 12/21/2009 5:47:01 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Any clue on who or whom is doing the piping on that project???

I’m kinda still available these days...


5 posted on 12/21/2009 5:52:05 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“The terminal, to be located on Coos Bay in Oregon...”

“The proposed Oregon LNG Project will be located on the east side of the Skipanon channel on the Skipanon Peninsula in Warrenton, Oregon...”

Warrenton is a long was from Coos Bay...


6 posted on 12/21/2009 6:00:07 AM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

I don’t think anyone is working this project beyond the conceptual phase.

I believe they are still in the permitting and promoting stage.


7 posted on 12/21/2009 6:02:13 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Good...

I know at least a few thousand pipers with resumes will inundate whomever that will be...

I know a lady who has 3000 of them on her desk, and will pull only about 200 (tops) for a project that needs them about the middle of next month...

You know thats the best lead anyone has had in almost a year now???


8 posted on 12/21/2009 6:04:55 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Leo Farnsworth
From the documents by Oregon LNG submitted to FERC to approve the facility:

“Oregon LNG proposes to construct and operate an onshore LNG receiving terminal and associated facilities on the East Bank Skipanon Peninsula (ESP) near the confluence of the Skipanon and Columbia Rivers at Warrenton, Clatsop County, Oregon”

I'm betting the journalist was wrong and the map is correct.

Resource Reports - Final Draft
http://oregonlng.com/pro_documents_final-draft.php

9 posted on 12/21/2009 6:07:45 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Would that be CB&I for Ecopetrol’s Cartagena Refinery expansion project?


10 posted on 12/21/2009 6:10:08 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leo Farnsworth
Oh Crap!!!

I mixed up projects.

There are (at least) two ongoing projects for building an LNG import Terminal. Both locations are correct, but the original article I posted is NOT about the project I linked it to.

The project from the article is located at:


11 posted on 12/21/2009 6:17:43 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

The CORRECT Project discussed in the article:

Jordan Cove Energy Project Overview:
The Project is located within the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay on an undeveloped site zoned for industrial development, approximately 7 nautical miles from the entrance of the federally controlled and maintained navigation channel.

LNG Storage Capacity – 320,000 cubic meters
Two 160,000 m3 full containment tanks
Sendout Capacity – 1,000,000 dth/day with a peak send-out of 1,200,000 dth/day
Pipeline Interconnections
Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline – 1,000,000 dth/day
Marine Facilities
Single LNG Marine Berth
Dedicated Tractor Tug dock
Integrated electric co-generation facility (32 MW)
Natural gas liquids (NGL) extraction

http://www.jordancoveenergy.com


12 posted on 12/21/2009 6:21:22 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Thanks for the clarification.

No fun taking a ship/boat over the Columbia River Bar at times...

13 posted on 12/21/2009 6:23:53 AM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thackney

**Eventually, if actually designed then built...**

Can you guys get it built before the Siera Club finds out it’s Planned???


14 posted on 12/21/2009 6:24:17 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Not when it takes years of public review of permits...


15 posted on 12/21/2009 6:29:40 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thackney

“There are (at least) two ongoing projects for building an LNG import Terminal. Both locations are correct, but the original article I posted is NOT about the project I linked it to.”

Actually there are three.
I believe that the one closest to reality (at present) is the one at Bradwood about 20 miles upstream from Astoria on the CR.


16 posted on 12/31/2009 4:43:54 PM PST by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson