To: BerserkPatriot
1911s arent reliable enough for me in terms of function.
190 posted on
12/16/2009 12:47:17 PM PST by
Armedanddangerous
(I think youre so full of inconsolable rage you don't care who you hurt)
To: Armedanddangerous
Thought about a 642 as a possible carry weapon, but I’ve pretty good luck with the 1911 type.
198 posted on
12/16/2009 1:31:18 PM PST by
BerserkPatriot
(There are no 1st Amendment rights without 2nd Amendment Rights)
To: Armedanddangerous
1911s arent reliable enough for me in terms of function.
Unless you shoot 2000 rounds between cleanings, I highly doubt your statement could be true for any quality 1911.
204 posted on
12/16/2009 3:56:05 PM PST by
Red in Blue PA
(Obama, Hitler, Stalin: Who are 3 people nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.)
To: Armedanddangerous
That is the FIRST time I have ever heard anybody say that.
I have been shooting 1911’s for 35 years ... own 9 of them from original issue to a of pair matched set accurized competition pieces. 8 of them colts, one a Taurus. I shoot almost every week, every year. Never had a reliabiltiy problem
Incidentally the Taurus shot as accutately out of the box brand new, as my matched set.
207 posted on
12/16/2009 4:26:56 PM PST by
HiramQuick
(work harder ... welfare recipients depend on you!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson