Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA sunspot activity prediction indicates next decade coldest in over a century [FR Exclusive]
Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA ^ | December 13, 2009 | nwrep

Posted on 12/13/2009 7:45:18 PM PST by nwrep

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: nwrep
NASA sunspot activity prediction indicates next decade coldest in over a century [FR Exclusive]

The DUmmies have already blamed this cooling decade on global warming. Yes, like massive government spending will reduce the deficit, global warming will cool the earth.
It sounds logical to me. (Huh? WT....?)

21 posted on 12/13/2009 8:09:28 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Sorry, I won’t believe it until the Old Farmer’s Almanac confirms.


22 posted on 12/13/2009 8:10:41 PM PST by norge (The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seton89

I saw the youtube video and thought it looked more like a seizure than a heart attack but a Pacemaker kicking in would explain that...


23 posted on 12/13/2009 8:13:49 PM PST by tubebender (Some minds are like concrete Thoroughly mixed up and permanently set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Here is an early thread on why this may not be true and the forecast should be revised down to zero sun spots.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2400331/posts


24 posted on 12/13/2009 8:16:20 PM PST by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
We seem to forget or ignore what our forefathers knew.

Very true. I bought a book called the Gardeners Weather Bible. It teaches the tricks the old timers used to use to predict the weather. It's still on my "to learn" list, though. I really should get back to that book. I keep getting side tracked by other stuff.

25 posted on 12/13/2009 8:16:49 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

GLOBAL WARMING OFFICALLY OVER says NASA! Time to move towards the equator everyone. All undocumented workers first.


26 posted on 12/13/2009 8:17:27 PM PST by pietraynor (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seton89
Seriously, did anyone check to see if the curry he had for dinner was checked for poison?

The top dog at the IPCC has a religious belief that the SUN never changes. Some of the running dog lackeys over there are not beyond killing opponents to that thesis.

27 posted on 12/13/2009 8:17:59 PM PST by muawiyah (Git Out The Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Nonsense! I distinctly remember during the summer, a Canadian astronaut in the space station remark how much less ice there was in the Arctic than when he was up there 10 years ago in the winter...


28 posted on 12/13/2009 8:17:59 PM PST by Dogbert41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

You’d think that sunspot data ought to be very accurate, certainly more accurate than the centuries of “average global temperatures” (based apparently for the most part of tree ring data from a few locations in the northern hemisphere), regardless of whether one claims that the temperature record shows a hockey-stick shaped surge to dangerous levels or a correlation to sunspot activity. I’m getting kind of sick and tired of statisticians pretending to be scientists when they have yet to come close to really understanding the science behind all this wonderful data.


29 posted on 12/13/2009 8:27:20 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41
Nonsense! I distinctly remember during the summer, a Canadian astronaut in the space station remark how much less ice there was in the Arctic than when he was up there 10 years ago in the winter...

10 years ago the cooling off cycle had just started, and the warming cycle was coming to an end. If true, the ice may have melted from the warning up cycle and now has to rebuild itself. A cycle usually last about 30 years. That's how the commies on the left got an entire generation thinking there was going to be an ice age. After that, a whole generation was led to believe the earth was going to burn up. Now, the commies have to go back to the death by ice age again.

30 posted on 12/13/2009 8:30:25 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dr_who

“I’m getting kind of sick and tired of statisticians pretending to be scientists when they have yet to come close to really understanding the science behind all this wonderful data.”

I assume this was facetious??


31 posted on 12/13/2009 8:32:09 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Does anyone know with some certainty how much total energy from the sun is getting absorbed by the earth in terms of electromagnetic waves, subatomic particles, and other stuff (like effects of tidal forces perhaps ...?). Seem to remember reading somewhere that the W/m^2 of light radiation (very easy to measure) hasn’t really changed that much at all although it may have been higher/lower a very long time ago.


32 posted on 12/13/2009 8:33:12 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
I doubt it. The last few years have been some of the coolest in centuries and they say those years are in the top 5 warmest ever, every year. It’s unlikely we will stay this cold, just by the law of averages, and since they have managed to fool the people into believing these last years have been warm, the people will continue to believe that the climate is unnaturally warm and getting warmer.
33 posted on 12/13/2009 8:33:24 PM PST by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
NASA? Although I have long said we are entering a prolonged period of cold, having NASA say the same gives me pause. NASA is no longer a trusted source.

Now that the global warming scam has been blown wide open - they're trying to save their butts by reporting the truth?

34 posted on 12/13/2009 8:33:26 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

You would enjoy my daughter’s facebook group, People’s Organization for the Preservation of the Earth or POPE. Their motto is (tongue firmly in cheek): Stop Global Warming, Extinguish the sun.


35 posted on 12/13/2009 8:33:39 PM PST by Vor Lady ("Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

bump for later read


36 posted on 12/13/2009 8:36:21 PM PST by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vor Lady

Hehe...Love it!!


37 posted on 12/13/2009 8:39:29 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Uhhh...in your first graph, the blue line is going up and the red line is going down. I don’t see how that proves we are headed for a decade of record low temps.


38 posted on 12/13/2009 8:39:30 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

I don’t think so. Correlation between A and B doesn’t mean A causes B, and says even less about why and how A influences B. But after hearing about all the wonderful liberties that CRU “scientists” took with the raw data that were all too happy to shred instead of sharing with all the different kinds of researchers out there (particularly given how historic and consequential this research was supposed to be for all mankind), I really doubt whether much of this has anything to do with science. Going by the plots up above, I don’t see a correlation between temperature and sunspot activity either.


39 posted on 12/13/2009 8:46:35 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Heh...The effects of the sun should and are delayed a bit I would think. At any rate, you sound like a global warming enthusiast to me... Good luck with that, but maybe you should listen to Lord Monckton and his cerebral analysis before becoming a pervert (whoops, I mean convert)...


40 posted on 12/13/2009 8:47:42 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson