[Popman]

You'd have to amend the Constitution.

I find it amazing SO MANY people do not understand "term limits" is not going to happen.

SCOTUS already ruled it unconstitutional and the process for term limits is called an "election"

[PubliusMM]

And, if you amend the Constitution you will have changed what SCOTUS must test against.

An Amendment to create term limits then would be the foundational law of the land. How can SCOTUS find unconstitutional what the people define as constitutional? Seems to me that would be a fuse on a powder keg.

It’s time to take back the country.

[JimVT]

You’re correct that the SCOTUS did rule against Congressional term limits in the 90s by a vote of FIVE to FOUR!

I’m not giving up on the possibility.

At the time 23 states voted 2-1 to change term limits

Maybe the next few years will see a makeup change in the Court and another attempt at sanity.

[A.A. Cunningham]

This world, including FR, is full of people who don’t pay attention.

[Reily]

No SCOTUS ruled that the individual states can't impose term limits. (A “Dred Scott” quality ruling as far as I am concerned!) However a Constitutional Amendment would only be stopped by the ability to get it passed.