Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

I believe the date 5-5-1966 is when that BC was issued, probably needed for entry into kindergarten. One might have been issued at DOB but misplaced and thus another replacement one made.


81 posted on 12/12/2009 5:38:10 PM PST by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone
I believe the date 5-5-1966 is when that BC was issued, probably needed for entry into kindergarten. One might have been issued at DOB but misplaced and thus another replacement one made.

Exactly, and that date was on the bottom of the copy, along with the seal, which indicates that it is a certified copy. It's not on the part that is a copy of the original. That's the way it was done, BC, before computers, and "AM", after microfilm. Before microfilm, you might get a handwritten or typed abstract, sort of like the computer generated abstract of these AC, after computer, days. Many states are now, or have plans to, go to just digitizing the whole original, as well as entering the data from it into a database. That way it's searchble, but when you need a copy, you get a copy, not an abstract, computer generated or not.

97 posted on 12/12/2009 10:45:19 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson