Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Notary Sojac; Petronski
In fact I do reject that approach. I frankly don't want to use the term antebellum intentionally, and I especially reject the idea that any other position is by definition not pro-life.

Your position IS NOT pro-life, it is pro-abortion and exactly the same as many Democrats. This notion that, "we'll just try to win hearts" was tried with slavery and the Republic was nearly destroyed fixing it. If something is wrong, it's wrong and public opinion shouldn't have a damn thing to do with it.

The ONLY acceptable solution for the Supreme Court would be to declare that the unborn are in fact persons and as such they enjoy the same rights as everyone else. If this does not happen, then a Constitutional amendment needs to be passed to declare the unborn persons.

2,331 posted on 12/14/2009 1:54:43 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2317 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee; Petronski
Both of the approaches you suggest (Supreme Court action or Constitutional amendment) are fine with me.

What I reject is the idea of outlawing abortion by something like an executive order.

2,369 posted on 12/14/2009 3:12:03 PM PST by Notary Sojac ("Goldman Sachs" is to "US economy" as "lamprey" is to "lake trout")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson