To: DGray
I, for one, am arguing for an understanding of how science and faith can work together, not for a rejection of faith (or of science, for that matter). There is no conflict between faith and (REAL) science; the conflict is between faith and (JUNK) science i.e. evolution. Aside from that, there is a larger conflict bertween evolution and other (REAL) branches of science, particularly mathematics and probability theory.
2,262 posted on
12/14/2009 12:27:11 PM PST by
wendy1946
( The claim here is that)
To: DGray; wendy1946; medved; tomzz; jeddavis; varmintman
There is no conflict between faith and (REAL) science; the conflict is between faith and (JUNK) science i.e. evolution. Aside from that, there is a larger conflict bertween evolution and other (REAL) branches of science, particularly mathematics and probability theory. Try posting Splifford again. It's your most cogent argument.
Not the words -- the graphic.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson