By who? AP?
The use of the word "reason" as an antonym for "science" is in error.
By who? AP?
By anyone who confuses the two.
To repeat myself: "science" is (or is supposed to be) empiricism. "Reason" is any mode of thought used to solve a problem that is logically consistent. Both uniformitarian evolutionism and literalist creationism are reasonable given the premises of each. The confusion of one with "faith" and one with "reason" is a childish error.