The following in that piece is either incredibly ill informed or a lie:
It's citing one side and then the opposition to it. So, the article is not as ill-informed as some of those who are quoted in opposition to the idea.
All that is doing is showing that there is opposition to it. You don't have to believe the opposition. That's science, anyway. You're going to have competing theories as to what "makes things work" the way they do.
It's just, in this particular case (of climate change...) I'm not on the side of the proponents of AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming).
Now, AGW cultists will deny this, but ALL of these steps are experimentally proven PHYSICS. Not computer modeling, not theory, but calculated, tested, and repeatably verified PHYSICS.
Well, that's the position of the video documentary that I supplied up above, The Great Global Warming Swindle... :-)
It's as I've put down in simplistic form...
sunspots --> solar winds --> cosmic rays --> clouds
as the mechanism for cooling and warming on this earth (in an abbreviated fashion)...
Well said. BTW, good info in your posts on this topic. Nicely done!