Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RogerWilko

If 1,700 scientists is ALL the scientists that the U.K. has, then this is a significant statement. However, if there are 20,000 scientists in the U.K. and only 1,700 chose to sign it,then this statement is pretty sad. I would like to know the percentage of scientists that signed this piece of garbage, as opposed to the total number. Otherwise, this means nothing to me.


27 posted on 12/10/2009 8:42:17 AM PST by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marstegreg
I would like to know the percentage of scientists that signed this piece of garbage, as opposed to the total number.

Or what percentage of the 1700 signers livelihood depends on the continuation of the fraud?

33 posted on 12/10/2009 8:48:14 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin - For such a time as this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: marstegreg

I’ve got a funny feeling that they’re probably not the majority of scientists, or otherwise, they’d be YELLING it from the rooftops!

You think for a minute they wouldn’t take the opportunity to SCREAM: “60, 70, or 80% OF SCIENTISTS SAY MAN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGING THE CLIMATE!!”

I say that it shows that it does mean NOTHING!


41 posted on 12/10/2009 8:58:12 AM PST by RogerWilko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson