Here is the true precedent from a most liberal professor. Read it and weap:
People can talk about Vattel, Blackstone, Edwards and on and on and try to tell me I'm dead wrong until they're blue in the face.
It doesn't change this:
Or this.
Ping me when you win a case.
Just because it happened, doesn’t make it legal or right.
http://constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/the-obama-administration-the-fuller-court/
Eventually the truth comes to light and justice is served. Will it happen soon, I’m not holding my breath.
I will however, not sit silent and let the truth be swept under the rug, nor will millions of others who know the truth.
You don’t need to be pinged, you lurk at FR wearing your Obamanoid kneepads, quick to leap onto any thread discussing Obama’s ineligibility. Is taunting now one of Axelgreasy’s instructions to you pukes? ... You use the tactic so liberally don’tchaknow. ... Ah, but you’re protected at FR!
While this picture may appear to be a convincing argument, it isn’t and your use of it is specious. Individual justices, the entire court even, can not simply choose to challenge the constitutionality of a thing without a standing case. Robert’s may have fully believed at the time of that photo that Obama was ineligible, but without a standing case he simply had to accept what was going on. Since we are a nation governed by laws, Robert’s knows full well that the remedy must also be according to the law. Had he refused to give the oath, he would have been circumventing the legal remedy to a legal issue that hadn’t yet been brought before the court. So your photo doesn’t mean anything.