Some famous person, and probably many who aren't famous, said “Never allow a lie to remain unanswered.” When the author repeats the old “everyone knows” saw about Obama’s natural born citizenship there is no need to read further.
The Kerchner ad is excellent for those who read it. For those who don't, being a natural born citizen means both parents are citizens as well has having been born on U.S. soil. Obama himself told us his father was was a British citizen, and that he was born a British subject. There has never been an interpretation of natural born citizen suggesting that someone born of a non-citizen father is a natural born citizen.
Don't be confused by natural born subject. Monarchies need soldier and taxpayers. A nation of laws needed assurances when it selected a commander in chief from among citizens. Natural born citizenship has a long history, and for good reason.
Obama knows the judicial system or knows people who do. He seems to count on deferring any discovery of his status, with the help of state-run media, the Democratic legislature, his courts, and the questionable status of John McCain, who, were he inclined, didn't dare challenge Obama’s “jus sanguinis” problem when McCain wasn't born on U.S. territory. No one questions McCain's patriotism, but we are still presumably a nation of laws.
HTML?