[tacticalogic]

Yes, that is real geology. Trying to make 100 t0 200 year old oil into umpteen million year old oil is fantasy.

Is assuming that uranium samples being mixed with lead and transuranics in excactly the proportions that indicate billions of years worth of decay doesn't mean they're really that old, no matter how many times you see it really science?

[editor-surveyor]

"Is assuming that uranium samples being mixed with lead and transuranics in excactly the proportions that indicate billions of years worth of decay doesn't mean they're really that old, no matter how many times you see it really science?"

Here we have a 'question' that consists of nothing but propagandistic support of specious assumptions of original conditions (AKA circular reasoning) that would be meaningless to bother answering. But I will say that it is obvious that no science was ever involved in the making of the assumptions; it was politics, and deviant sociology at best.