The fact that the letter was from 2004 and not 2001 only makes it worse. It means he was carrying out this insane policy for 3 years and still hadn’t learned anything. The arrogance displayed in his reply to the Prosecutor’s very reasonable letter is inexcusable at anytime under any circumstances.
Hogwash. It just shows he has a sense of humor, something more politicians could benefit from. Probably several letters went back and forth and perhaps the guy was being being snotty and so the funny letter rounded out the conversation.
Without any details about what transpired in full this really has no effect at all on the debate, since it has nothing to do with Clemmons.