Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rastus
His total from the eight felonies added up to 108 years.

Assuming he got the maximum sentence for each felony and the sentences were to be served consecutively.

It was way overboard. I've never heard of something like that happening to a teenager.

John duPont was sentenced to just 13 to 30 years in prison. John Hinckley only served 32 years in prison.

149 posted on 12/06/2009 1:49:58 PM PST by Tribune7 (God bless Carrie Prejean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
Dear Tribune7,

It appears that in Arkansas, prison sentences are given out almost in dog years. From what I've read, the parole board is a pretty easy group of folks, and once you're eligible for parole, you need to do something pretty nasty to be denied it.

Thus, one must evaluate Mr. Clemmons’ “108-year” sentence in light of his first parole date, which I've read to be in 2015. From 1989 or 1990, that's not 108 years. That's not even half of 108 years. It's about 26 years, or about a little less than quarter of the sentence.

I've never heard of a state where you need to serve less than one-quarter of your sentence to be ordinarily eligible for parole.

Gov. Huckabee acted in a way that strongly suggests that he knew the parole board would parole just about anyone eligible, as when he commuted Mr. Clemmons’ sentence to 47 years, 5 months and 19 days, it made Mr. Clemmons eligible for parole as of the day of the commutation, even though he only served about 11 years or so. The parole board released Mr. Clemmons a few weeks later.

Thus, it's disingenuous to argue that Mr. Clemmons received a 108-year sentence, and thus would spend the rest of his life in prison. Rather, he was handed down a sentence that was formally 108 years, but that would likely require 26 years of incarceration.

One hundred eight years IS a little excessive for three brutal assaults, a couple of robberies, a fairly significant breaking, entering and burglary, weapons charges, and violent and attempted violent attacks against prison and judicial personnel.

But truthfully, 26 years seems a little on the light side.

And 11 years is a mockery of justice.

Mr. Clemmons brutally assaulted a SEVENTH grader. That's a child about 12 years old. He beat a woman for $16 and beat a man for a piece of jewelry. This is a fellow who needs little incentive to hurt people.

While awaiting trial, he took apart a door to make the door hinge into a weapon, he tried to assault a guard with a lock, he tried to steal a guard’s firearm, and he so credibly threatened the judge in his case that the judge had him appear in court in leg shackles.

This is not someone who received 108 years for a couple of thefts and a burglary. This is someone who effectively received 26 years for a series of brutal assaults followed by attempts to escape incarceration by harming prison and judicial personnel.

When I described the series of crimes to my family, my son said, “This is the sort of person we build prisons for.”

Ironically, if Mr. Clemmons had been left in prison to his original parole date in 2015, he'd still be alive today, the little girl would not have been raped, and four police officers would not have been brutally murdered.

Twenty-six years in prison for a string of violent crimes and a string of attempted violence while in custody is far from unreasonable.


sitetest

152 posted on 12/06/2009 3:56:06 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

To: Tribune7
Dear Tribune7,

By the way, John Hinckley didn't serve a prison sentence, not of 32 years or of any other length.

He was acquitted of attempted assassination of the president by reason of insanity and is committed to St. Elizabeth's Hospital in Washington, DC. At this point, after 28 years (not 32), he is now permitted out on to see his mother nine days at a time, and his restrictions have been otherwise loosened. Nonetheless, he is still a residential patient at the hospital.


sitetest

153 posted on 12/06/2009 4:03:10 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson