Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Irisshlass

New proof, whole story is BS

This from new AJC posting

"Although AirTran previously had declined to release the flight manifest, that changed Friday evening. In addition to discounting Petruna's story, the airline responded to the amount of attention it believed the circulated e-mail was gaining, said Christopher White, AirTran spokesman.

There was no way Petruna could have seen what he described on Flight 297, AirTran said in a statement. Petruna departed from Akron-Canton, Ohio, on AirTran Flight 205 on Nov. 17, officials said. He was supposed to connect to Flight 297 to head to Houston, but he missed his first flight out of Ohio. And therefore, he missed the connecting flight.

"Flight 297, the flight which Mr. Patruna allegedly wrote a first-hand account of, originally pushed back from its gate in Atlanta at 4:40 p.m. EST, a full 26 minutes before flight 205 arrived at the gate in Atlanta making this flight connection impossible," according to AirTran.

Neither Petruna nor Hackemack responded to requests from the AJC to speak to them Friday evening.

end of AJC story

Petruna could not have seen what he claims to have seen, (and he started it all, it all hangs on him) because he was in midair, on another flight, when it happened. He was pissed at AirTran because he missed his flight, and decided to start a rumor about it to hurt them, and now has been caught.


19 posted on 12/05/2009 8:34:10 AM PST by MindBender26 (Never kick Dems when they're down. Wait 'till they're 1/2 way back up. You get much better leverage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MindBender26

How can he start a rumor..when you have “other” witnesses.

Doug Hagman interviewed 7 other witnesses which included two law enforcement officers who handled the after action reports.

“According to one airline security official, “This was a deliberate, well planned attempt to disrupt a domestic flight that was organized in advance of the boarding of these [Muslim] passengers. The purpose of their actions appeared to be multi-faceted, not the least of which was an attempt to change their status from passengers to victims of religious profiling”

Petruna was in midair when they incident took place. But you have 7 other witnesses which includes law enforcement. And the orginal crew refused to fly the plane.


20 posted on 12/05/2009 8:52:20 AM PST by Irisshlass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26

Perhaps, but I know you like to cover up for the government regarding airplane stuff. Remember this one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461454/posts?q=1&;page=1


21 posted on 12/05/2009 8:54:28 AM PST by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: MindBender26
If that were true, then how did he know ANYTHING at all happened on the flight??? Well???

Tell you what, you claim to be a former TV reporter. Use those skills rather than rely on what you are hearing from "interested" parties online. Use your resources, to locate and talk to several Flight Personnel who work for AirTran. Ask several, because most will be suspicious of a stranger asking them about it. Do not record them, do not tell them you will disseminate the info. Find out first hand what the story is. Do not tell us the details as that would be a personal violation of their privacy. But, if/when you find out what really happened... you can drop your crusade and you can be satisfied in knowing something that most don't.
22 posted on 12/05/2009 8:54:46 AM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson