[MrEdd]

The easment in question legally required notification of the land owner - as per the artoicle had you been literate enough to read it.

It doesn’t make a damned bit of difference where the equipment was parked.

[muawiyah]

It does appear the easement holder and the landholder had been notifying each other quite a bit in the immediate past.

[muawiyah]

Now, having given you the answer for why I whizzed right on past that part you think is compelling ~ give notice to owner ~ I'd like to know why you were too illiterate to read the part about where these two parties had been busy dragging each other through court recently AND, most importantly, that a judge had lifted an injunction against the pipeline country regarding what they were, in fact, at that moment, doing.

This is a dispute between a landowner and an easement holder over MONEY, not over RIGHTS BEING TRAMPLED.