The easment in question legally required notification of the land owner - as per the artoicle had you been literate enough to read it.
It doesn’t make a damned bit of difference where the equipment was parked.
It does appear the easement holder and the landholder had been notifying each other quite a bit in the immediate past.
This is a dispute between a landowner and an easement holder over MONEY, not over RIGHTS BEING TRAMPLED.