“And to think, unlike Creationists and IDers, those who subscribe to Darwin’s evo-atheist creation myth could not see this coming a mile a way.”
—What is the “this”? That there might be *one* scientist (Jungers) not fully convinced that Ardi is bipedal? Umm, I doubt anyone is surprised that there isn’t 100% consensus. Instead, there is only an overwhelming majority of scientists in agreement that Ardi is bipedal.
The article had a strange title: “Scientists Back Off of Ardi Claims”. It made it sound like the article would be about scientists backing off their original claims of Ardi - when the article didn’t even attempt to display such a thing.
Well there was your first mistake. You expected something truthful from Less (Godless, Gunless, Gutless).
Hence my post of #5 which stated the article was a deliberate LIE, and a misdirection.
— typical of grimygophergonads.