Could you be more specific?
The fossils were heralded as missing links and it turns out they were wrongly classified.
What’s the lie here?
Is it that the author said that the fossils weren’t what they were claimed to be in the first place?
Or that someone initially claimed that they were something they weren’t after all?
xcamel just likes to call those whom she disagrees with “liars” regardless of the veracity of the accusation. Thus, when she calls creationists liars, she is herself committing a lie. And you know what, her evo-atheist animal impulses are perfectly ok with it.
Crickets, crickets......
Still waiting for you to enlighten us about what in this article is a lie.........