To: cyn
“Why werent these passengers charged?”
Probably because the account in the viral email isn’t accurate. A witness said it was a camera, not a cell phone. There is no first class section on that flight. Etc. How could a person in “first class” hear a conversation in the back of the plane?
As with most accounts, the truth makes for a less compelling viral email.
27 posted on
12/04/2009 5:20:46 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: AppyPappy
“Just because you are paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you” comes to mind!
I would love for you to be right, but just because it’s in a viral email doesn’t mean it’s not true.
There’s more to it, let’s see what that is. There are names coming out now, let there be a free flow of information on this.
29 posted on
12/04/2009 5:27:08 AM PST by
cyn
To: AppyPappy
“How could a person in first class hear a conversation in the back of the plane?”
1.Aircraft at the gate-engines off.
2.Domestic flight-Airbus 320/321.Small aircraft.
3.Someone speaks loud-you can hear it for sure :-))
4.Try to fly 1st class more often:-)))
37 posted on
12/04/2009 5:45:33 AM PST by
QQQQ
To: AppyPappy
To speak to one element of your post: on Air Tran 717-200’s there are 12 business class seats. Since it is a two class cabin, it is perfectly reasonable for someone to call that area first class.
47 posted on
12/04/2009 6:16:40 AM PST by
starlifter
(Sapor Amo Pullus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson