Interesting isn't it? After 140 posts no Obot has answered your simple question.
Well...I have an observation and 3 questions to ask:
An honest man would be **HONORED** to promptly and fully prove in every way to any citizen that he was a natural born citizen and eligible to be president.
—What do Obama’s actions have to say about his honor and honesty?
—What do Obama’s actions have to say about the honor and honesty of those who defend him?
—What do Obama’s actions have to say about the honor and honesty of the so-called **CONSERVATIVE** media who have utterly IGNORED Obama’s eligibility? That means Rush, Beck, Hannity, OReilly, Levine, Medved, Malkin,...( And I hold Coulter in special contempt!)
( We know that the mainstream media has no honor or honesty. That's a given.
Why do you keep asking the same questions, even though you've had them answered. Whatever, here we go again:
—What do Obama’s actions have to say about his honor and honesty?
For the 10th time, he's not an honorable or honest man. So what? I don't think a single Freeper would say he's an honorable.
Why do you keep repeating that question as if it were somehow relevant to his eligibility?
—What do Obama’s actions have to say about the honor and honesty of the so-called **CONSERVATIVE** media who have utterly IGNORED Obama’s eligibility? That means Rush, Beck, Hannity, OReilly, Levine, Medved, Malkin,...( And I hold Coulter in special contempt!)
It reflects very well on their honor.
Part of being honorable means respecting the truth, even if that means defending a man one loaths from suprious charges.