It is absolutely true that you are in denial, yes.
"None of your regurgitated quotes that you do not understand supply any support at all for your lie that your gravity imbalance of the rest of the universe causing the Sun to orbit the Earth is according to Einstein."
At least you no longer deny the equality of geocentrism and geokineticism under GR. That's good.
"Blathering on and on about coordinate systems does nothing to support your lie that your gravity imbalance model is according to Einstein."
Again, trying to label opposing models with emotionally-charged terms and accusations is a fool's errand.
"To support your position you would need an actual quote from Einstein where he signs on to your gravity imbalance model, and there simply isn't any; because Einstein wasn't a moron."
I see that you have misrepresented your characterization of my position with my position. But I understand that is necessary for you to have a point.
What they are NOT equivalent as is as a model of gravitation.
Your contention that your “gravitational imbalance” model causing the Sun to orbit the Earth is “according to Einstein” was what I have asked in post after post for you to substantiate.
Nice to see that after a dozen or so posts the point finally starts to sink in.
Are you now going to actually supply any support at all that your system is “according to Einstein”?
No. Of course you are not, because it was a lie, and Einstein would have to be an absolute moron to buy into your ludicrous model.
The gravity necessary to drag the Sun around the Earth would not leave the Earth motionless, but would sweep it up like a leaf in a storm.
But you are incapable of addressing this issue with any facts or figures involving the equation for gravitational attraction or any peer reviewed literature; so I stand ready for your to post your drivel about them being equivalent as coordinate systems again.
What else can you do other than to repeatedly repeat yourself, you certainly cannot substantiate your lie.
“Not according to Einstein” Gourmet Dan
You are unable to substantiate that the model described above is “according to Einstein”, this model is not “according to Einstein”, your contention that it is “according to Einstein” is a lie.