It is quite appropriate to present the evidence over and over when confronted with someone who uses serial denial as a form of argument.
Again, according to Einstein:
“Can we formulate physical laws so that they are valid for all CS [coordinate systems], not only those moving uniformly, but also those moving quite arbitrarily, relative to each other? […] The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either CS could be used with equal justification. The two sentences: “the sun is at rest and the earth moves” or “the sun moves and the earth is at rest” would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different CS.”
Einstein, A. and Infeld, L. (1938) The Evolution of Physics, p.212 (p.248 in original 1938 ed.); Note: CS = coordinate system
"But creationists must lie about science out of necessity."
Again, trying to label opposing models with emotionally-charged terms and accusations is a fool's errand.
None of your regurgitated quotes that you do not understand supply any support at all for your lie that your ‘gravity imbalance of the rest of the universe causing the Sun to orbit the Earth’ is “according to Einstein”.
You have supplied nothing but your own assertions that such is the case.
Blathering on and on about coordinate systems does nothing to support your lie that your ‘gravity imbalance’ model is “according to Einstein”.
To support your position you would need an actual quote from Einstein where he signs on to your “gravity imbalance” model, and there simply isn't any; because Einstein wasn't a moron.