[GourmetDan]

"One thing Einstein is NOT saying and NEVER said, was that the Sun orbited the Earth, or that the gravity “imbalance” of the “rest of the universe” could cause such a thing. But apparently you cannot understand that."

Again, taking their statements together Einstein, Born, Hoyle and Ellis say that geocentrism and geokineticism are equivalent under GR. Apparently you cannot understand that.

"Where is your peer reviewed literature to back up your claims about this putative gravity “imbalance” that would cause the Sun to orbit the Earth?"

According to the statements of Einstein, Born, Hoyle and Ellis geocentrism and geokineticism are equivalent as CS, physically and observationally under GR. You would need to falsify GR to have a valid point. You might as well use "Alec's Evolution Pages" and articles written by 'Alec' as a 'scientific source'.

But you've already been there and done that.

[allmendream]

“So now once again you ARE saying that it is the gravity of the “rest of the universe” causing the Sun to move around the Earth. That is impossible. The gravity to cause the Sun to move around the Earth in such a way would sweep up the Earth like a leaf in a storm. Absolutely impossible.” ME

“Not according to Einstein, Born, Hoyle and Ellis.” GourmetDan

Show me where Einstein said that the gravity of the “rest of the universe” could move the Sun around the Earth while leaving the Earth motionless. Not your drivel about them being equivalent as a COORDINATE SYSTEM. You lie when you say “according to Einstein”. Einstein never signed on to your ludicrous geocentricism, and never said ANYTHING about any “gravitational imbalance” from the “rest of the universe” moving the Sun around the Earth. You lie.