This is known as the 'negative proof fallacy'. That is, if your imagination cannot be proven false, then it is true. Once again, fallacy used as 'support' for evolution.
As I posted, 'putatative' means "commonly accepted or supposed or assumed to exist or to have existed". Simply put, it's a belief and beliefs cannot be refuted as you again demonstrate below.
"And coordinate system doesn't explain what force is moving what and how; it just explains the COORDINATES. Quote people about CS’s all you want, it doesn't answer the question about what FORCE is doing the moving."
What do you not understand about "...it is the main tenet of the Einstein theory that any two ways of looking at the world which are related to each other by a coordinate transformation are entirely equivalent from a physical point of view..."? You would have to claim that gravity is metaphysical to have a point.
"But thanks for showing the futility of reliance upon flawed scriptural interpretation in lieu of actual scientific discovery. How ludicrous and moronic your arguments are. That is why I like having you ramble on about coordinate systems and the Sun going around the Earth. HILARIOUS!"
Actually, I used to believe in geokineticism over Scripture until I started turning up quotes by knowledgeable people showing the equivalence of the two models under GR. At that point, it became senseless to choose geokineticism over geocentrism any longer.
I actually appreciate your continued focus on the subject as it allows me to reach those who may not have heard. Thanks.
You think you understand relativity better than him?
And “ways of looking at it” STILL doesn't explain what FORCE is doing the moving.
Gravity moves the Earth around the Sun.
There is no force that could move the Sun around the Earth while leaving the Earth motionless.
Simple physics, no wonder it confounds you so.