Well, if geneticists have said it for years and it has been confirmed by data, it should not be a problem for you to provide a peer-reviewed reference.
"Here is a reference..."
That reference merely repeats the faulty generalization error you committed earlier.
I should have been more precise in asking for a peer-reviewed reference. Not only for the supposed fusion but also for the genes supposedly lining up.
Surely you can do better than that if geneticists have said it for years and it has been confirmed by data.
"Geocentric idiocy duly noted."
What part of "People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations,” Ellis argues. “For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations.” do you not understand?
Exactly the way crevos pi$$ on your leg and tell you it's raining.
Ellis did not have the data showing that the universe is far from symetrical, nor the proof from gravity lensing that far more universe exists out there [in some directions, and not others] than we can observe without 'special tricks' provided by nature itself.
My source HAD peer review references. Here they are in as you were obviously not smart enough to figure it out.
1. http://www.fhcrc.org/labs/trask/subtelomeres/
2. Yunis, J. J., Sawyer, J.R., Dunham, K., The striking resemblance of high-resolution g-banded chromosomes of man and chimpanzee. Science, Vol. 208, 6 June 1980, pp. 1145 - 1148
3. IJdo JW, Baldini A, Ward DC, Reeders ST, Wells RA, Origin of human chromosome 2: an ancestral telomere-telomere fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991 Oct 15;88(20):9051-5; available on-line here:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/88/20/9051.pdf
4. Avarello R, Pedicini A, Caiulo A, Zuffardi O, Fraccaro M, Evidence for an ancestral alphoid domain on the long arm of human chromosome 2. Hum Genet 1992 May;89(2):247-9