[Natural Law]

"Dude, try reading the ENTIRE thing, in context, realizing that there is an OLD and NEW Testament, that Jesus came to abe a Savior to remove much of the OT ‘law’, as it could only CONDEMN and not SAVE.

Biblical Cherry-pickers, quite amusing overall."

As a courtesy perhaps you could post a marked up Old Testament to show which parts are allegorical, which parts are literal, and which parts are no longer applicable. I would hate for our cherry picking to not be synchronized with yours.

[RoadGumby]

Perhaps you could please illustrate where I used the word or idea that the Bible is ‘allegorical’?

If you are hostile to Faith, then so be it. But try to keep it elsewhere (DU Perhaps?)

There is much of the ‘Law’ in the OT that is no longer applicable, due to the sacrifeice of Jesus on the Cross. If you do not understand that, and Truly wish to learn, that would be great. If you only wish to try to mock, then I would sooner you not let the proverbial door hit you on the way out.