[opentalk]

There exists a possibility that the EPA’s current approach might succeed by some judicial fluke

From earlier posted link:

"The Supreme Court ruled over a year ago that CO2 emissions are pollution as covered in the Clean Air Act,"

"The U.S. EPA as a result of that court ruling has the [authority] to mandate reductions….Yes, there would be some efforts in the legislative branch to remove that authority but anything in the legislative branch of that sort would be vetoed by the president."

--I wonder if the court ruling was based on the corrupted data. If so this will continue to blow up.

[Buckeye McFrog]

—I wonder if the court ruling was based on the corrupted data. If so this will continue to blow up.

Any idea what the penalty is for submitting false evidence to the US Supreme Court?

[thouworm]

Meant to ping you to post #28