Beam me to Planet Gore !
CRU = IPCC
And she is a BFF of obama.
Alleged scientific misconduct and academic dishonesty at Barack Obama's Environmental Protection Agency
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has already put it on record in her letter to the Wall Street Journal that the real purpose of so-called greenhouse gas regulations, such as government-mandated cap and trade regulations, is to enrich Barack Obama's campaign contribution bundlers at J.P. Morgan Chase (six figures in bundled contributions) and Goldman Sachs (almost a million dollars in bundled contributions).
Bundled contributions are entirely legal but the thing nonetheless speaks for itself; Barack Obama is dancing the cap-and-trade with the fat cat climate profiteers who brought (or bought) him at the expense of the American people. This could easily be why his Environmental Protection Agency is allegedly engaging in academic dishonesty and scientific misconduct to support the cap and trade agenda.
We refer specifically to the alleged suppression of research that does not support Barack Obama's "climate change" agenda, and therefore does not support the bottom lines of Goldmine Sachs (Michael Savage's terminology), J.P. Morgan Chase, and their fellow climate profiteers at General Electric (almost $500,000 in bundled contributions to elect Obama).
This was from (Sept 09) :
Climate lawsuits are coming, AL Gore & Czar Browner warn
Former Vice President Al Gore and current White House climate change czar Carol Browner are warning companies and lawmakers that the courts will step in to regulate greenhouse gases if Congress fails to act.
"All of the discussion has been about the president and the Congress," Gore told journalists at a U.N. press conference Tuesday. "We have a third branch of government: the courts."
I think Gore was counting on using EPA and the courts to advance his agenda as backup.
When this authority to regulate GHGs passes to EPA, not if, we will see the ultimate irony as the first lawyers to hit the court door to sue them will likely be the the NRDC formed coincidently with the EPA under Nixon.
The second wave, made up of the deniers will be a double-barreled attack that will blow the heart clean out the bared breast of this lumbering beast.
There’ll be green blood in the streets of D.C.
that phrase “judicial fluke” is alarming. All the tentacles of ClimateFraud have to be lopped off, so this beast can shrivel up and die. (from my post #15).
Fred Nerks: Just peruse the mess we in the US have made (and Oz has apparently avoided) -— the tentacles!!! and SCOTUS!
Thread posted by Nachum:
E.P.A. Says It Expects to Raise Amount of Ethanol Allowed in Fuel Blends to 15%
NY Times ^ | 12/2/2009 | MATTHEW L. WALD
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency said Monday that it would probably increase the amount of ethanol that gasoline retailers could blend into ordinary fuel, to 15 percent, if tests established that the blend would not damage cars.
The maximum ethanol blend is now 10 percent, except for cars specially equipped to handle higher blends. The agency said it was likely to approve the increase to 15 percent next summer, perhaps for use only in cars of the 2001 model year and later.
~~~~~
Post # 11 from Freeper Tarpon in linked THREAD
Why sure, even the California CARB says ethanol produces 2.5 times the CO2 than does plain old gasoline. Before Schwarzenegger made them take it down.
And according to the US Governments EIA the USA has more fossil fuel resources than any other nation ... So we have to do something to get the prices up for Americans — Don’t you understand, it’s so unfair.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
And Post 19 from Freeper Fred Hayek:
With the exception of FlexFuel vehicles, running on a greater than 10% ethanol blend will void manufacturers’ warranties.
To err is human, but it takes a government to really **** things up.
