[wendy1946]

I’m not a believer in a literal reading of Genesis, but there’s no way that soft tissue could survive for sixty million years. If that stuff really is dino tissue, then the currently accepted timeline is wrong.

Bingo, another person gets it... Midrashim and other literature and artwork indicate that there were a number of leftover dinosaurs walking around at a time just prior to the flood. The true main age of dinosaurs would have been several thousand or a few tens of thousands of years back, but not tens of millions.

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

The true main age of dinosaurs would have been several thousand or a few tens of thousands of years back

I forget--what's your explanation for why, if dinosaurs are no older than, say, mammoths, we find entire mammoth bodies preserved, along with their stomach contents, while we only find bones and fragments of fossilized soft tissue for dinosaurs?

[xcamel]

Source please?