Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
One of the intended consequences of universal suffrage...

I heard once that one used to have to own land in order to vote. If true, it may not be a bad idea except that I'm in the military and don't own land. But, I bet everybody would invest in this land instead of mooching off of it if every voter had a personal stake in it.

254 posted on 12/05/2009 6:41:10 PM PST by Engineer_Soldier (My oath is to the Constitution, not to the state or the President. http://oathkeepers.org/oath/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: Engineer_Soldier
"I heard once that one used to have to own land in order to vote. If true, it may not be a bad idea except that I'm in the military and don't own land. But, I bet everybody would invest in this land instead of mooching off of it if every voter had a personal stake in it."

That was the original intent. Universal suffrage was not a new thing when it was implemented in the U.S. It was known as 'democracy' in ancient times (Greece and Rome) and was simply mob rule. (e.g., 'Bread and Circuses' in ancient Rome.) It has taken a couple of hundred years to subvert the Constitution to the point that we now have 'mob rule' in the U.S., but the consequences are easy to recognize.

Basically the republic survives until the overwhelming mass of 'citizens' begins to vote themselves money out of the treasury in the belief that it is 'free'.

289 posted on 12/08/2009 8:14:51 AM PST by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson