Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan; mkjessup; rabscuttle385; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; Landru; Impy; ...
RE :”I would guess he spearheaded it. The massive withdrawal from the money markets so close to the election and Soros’ history of destroying national economies for his own personal aggrandizement and his leftist agenda leaves little room for doubt that he was involved.

Here's what you have to believe to be a Bush-bot like Wpin and ohioWfan are. The great GWB economic boom, the greatest success story in mankind, was crashed all because G Soros withdrew his money from a bank or two. To destroy GWB legacy, and Obama elected, and beat McCain, Soros was willing to destroy the world economy. If only that mean George Soros kept his money in the bank, house prices would have continued to double every year or two, we could continue refinance our loans every year or two to pay the bills, and buy houses, cars, boats TVs and in fact give up work completely (we had illegals to do that for us). This was real economic growth. Paradise lost! ,

LOL, these bots really believe crazy stuff like this! Wouldn't you think the Chinese superpower would be a bit upset is this nonsense is true??? Morons!

201 posted on 12/03/2009 8:02:26 PM PST by sickoflibs ( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the government spending you demand stupid")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs

Once again, sickoflibs, you nailed it. I notice that your aliterations and overall writing have become sharper and terser. Always glad to hear from you.

I think more and more conservative folks are seeing things our way. In any case, Bush has been gone long enough that what he may have or have not done is becoming irrelevant. The Marxist Onada pretty much owns the economy now and that is borne out in his declining polling numbers.

I am a bit nonplussed about Rush L. The other day he was railing against third parties. Among other things he challenged someone to tell him when a third party won or, for that matter, advanced conservatism.

He wants us all to stick with the GOP and take it back. There are two things wrong with what he said. First, since when has voting for a RINO ever advanced conservatism? Second, he assumes the GOP will allow itself to be taken back.

I’ve had this same discussion with FRs. When I ask them how exactly do conservatives take back the GOP, the response is no response—or name calling. If Rush thinks people like me are ever gonna vote for a RINO again he’s out of touch.

I’m hoping that Palin will have the star and horsepower to force the GOP to support her for president. Particularly after the GOP got its butt kicked in NY 23. Absent that, I’m hoping she can put together enough of a coalition of conservatives and indies to make a credible run for the presidency. There is no one else out there who commands the attention she gets—almost without even trying.

The Huckabee criminal sentence commutation, IMHO, has taken him out of the presidential picture. I was never very excited about the man anyway. Romney is a true blue RINO. Ron Paul seems to have a cult-like following. But I don’t think he can swing others his way. Other names that have popped up like flares have fizzled out quickly.


225 posted on 12/04/2009 9:17:49 AM PST by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson