Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: offduty
1967-1971, honorable discharge and your self. And yes you are promoting nation building, same old as soon as we get the army trained. Broken record!!!
84 posted on 12/01/2009 8:29:17 PM PST by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: org.whodat

1970-1976 Since you asked. And I still remember walking through Atlanta airport in A’s and having a Delta stew stop me and drop a cigarette butt in my hand and laughing at the gesture. So we have some things in common.

I do not support nation-buiiding in the sense that we make a long-term commitment to a regime.

You have to admit, this is a different type of war than what we’ve faced in the past. There are no nation-states that are combatants. We are facing a bunch of religious zealots that are aligned with an ideal, not a nation. This is going to have to be fought in a different way. Frankly, the war in Iraq was still against a nation-state, the Taliban is not. Al-Quida is not.

But what sense does it make to announce to our enemies that we are going to send 30,000 more troops and then start to withdraw them in 18 months. There has to be SOMETHING to use as a guage. I don’t want to withdraw our guys in 18 months to have to re-deploy them again in another 18 months. If the “mission” is to break the back of the Taliban, then that is the mission.

Since you think this is “nation-building”, what guage would you use?


99 posted on 12/01/2009 8:42:09 PM PST by offduty (Joe Biden is still looking for the video tape of FDR's address to the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson