A real example from real life would have been far more effective and made him look like less of an idiot.
It looks like evos grasping at straws again to find something, anything, somewhere, anywhere to bolster their explanations for the ToE.
And you going on to defend it,....
Well,.... it’s not impressive, to say the least.
There is nothing an evolutionist can say do that’s too stupid for FR evolutionists to not defend it. It would do you guys a lot of good PR wise to look at some of this stuff and admit that the person’s judgment was poor, they spoke to soon, they presumed too much, they used a bad example, whatever.
But to just knee jerk defend anything without regard to how it looks to others, puts you in the same boat.
The number of times those in the evolutionary world have jumped the gun about some new discovery and had to eat those words, has done more to cut into their credibility than ANYTHING a creationist has had to say.
In their haste to find support for the ToE, or manufacture it for that matter, evolutionists are their own worst enemy.
Yeah....making an illustration of what tweaking a Hox gene will do......soooooo “stupid”.....kick the strawman around some more.
There was a real example....fruit flies that grew wings instead of haltares when the gene was tweaked.....telling what the gene does.
Only those ignorant of modern genetics must rely on calling into question someone’s grammar or reading comprehension.....it’s an old tactic.
I “comprehend” quite well that you have no clue what was being illustrated and feel like using your ignorance and that of others in your echo chamber of dinosaurs to kick around a strawman of the point of the illustration, the point of which went right over your uneducated-in-the-matter head.