Looks alot like Boeing's X-45 or 47 but, the viewing angle makes it difficult to tell. Could simply be a variant. Who knows? Interesting pic, anyway.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Reaganesque
Looks like a UAV to me. They are getting bigger and bigger, it seems.
2 posted on
12/01/2009 1:25:27 PM PST by
llevrok
(Love and mental illness are similar. At first, all seems normal.)
To: Reaganesque
I’m guessing “No canopy”.
Canopies are generally clear, and whatever that is shows no sign whatsoever of transparency. I think it’s just part of the air inlet.
4 posted on
12/01/2009 1:27:51 PM PST by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Reaganesque
To: Reaganesque
Could it be manned, but covered so that the canopy doesn’t appear?
To: Reaganesque
8 posted on
12/01/2009 1:31:49 PM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 314 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: Reaganesque
Where can I get one? So, cool
better than the Acrostar” Microjet.
10 posted on
12/01/2009 1:32:44 PM PST by
ntmxx
(I am not so sure about this misdirection!)
To: Reaganesque
It looks like a UAV based roughly on the B=2 flying wing design. Without some sense of scale it’s hard to tell for sure, but that thing does not look big enough to carry a pilot.
Bet me that what looks like a canopy could be some sort of sensor array, akin to the Aegis antenna on that class of Naval vessel.
In any case this would not be the first time we were surprised by some new variant...
11 posted on
12/01/2009 1:34:12 PM PST by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts....)
To: Reaganesque
It looks smaller (based on the wheelbase) than the x-45 or -47, but the intake profile looks like the boeing UAV prototypes. Ditto the wing profile. This thing is supposed to be an actual air-combat platform, with stealth. This particular one looks like it can’t carry more than 4 missiles, but it probably has a gun bay too. This isn’t some rinky-dink R/C-plane Predator. This is the real deal. High sub-mach, aerial maneuverability, moderate loiter, and substantial firepower.
13 posted on
12/01/2009 1:35:16 PM PST by
Little Pig
(Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
To: Reaganesque
To me, it looks like this Northrup Grumman Marine stealth drone seen at the 2004 Miramar Airshow. Size and wheel configuration are spot on. Pretty cool drone indeed!
![](http://pilotage.com/features/mmr_04/Stealth_800W.jpg)
14 posted on
12/01/2009 1:35:16 PM PST by
Shortwave
(Our liberty cannot be taken away unless the people themselves the accomplices.)
To: Reaganesque
X-45 is only similar:
![](http://robocat.users.btopenworld.com/Images/x-45c-1.jpg)
15 posted on
12/01/2009 1:36:12 PM PST by
frithguild
(Can I drill your head now?)
To: Reaganesque
that looks like a UAV to me, too, one design I saw on the drawing boards in news articles kind of thing
18 posted on
12/01/2009 1:41:56 PM PST by
RaceBannon
(OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE IS SHOVEL READY...FOR SENIORS!!:: NObama. Not my president.)
To: Reaganesque
...it could be a very small manned plane... Oh sure. Make fun of small people. So easy a small man could fly it?
:^)
20 posted on
12/01/2009 1:43:51 PM PST by
McGruff
(We're Going Rogue Baby!)
To: Reaganesque
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8f/X-47A_rollout.jpg/800px-X-47A_rollout.jpg)
Production version of this UAV?
22 posted on
12/01/2009 1:45:04 PM PST by
ZOOKER
( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
To: Reaganesque
![](http://images30.fotki.com/v1038/photos/3/345978/3383656/riteMartianPhotographC12149935-vi.jpg)
![](http://www.secure-business-zone.com/images/comedian1.jpg)
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
23 posted on
12/01/2009 1:46:01 PM PST by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: Reaganesque
25 posted on
12/01/2009 1:48:47 PM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Reaganesque
Point of personal clarification: What are a plane’s “buttocks?”
To: Reaganesque
To: Reaganesque
F-117 was retired about 1.5 years ago. Maybe this is why.
To: Reaganesque
Boeing X-45C-1 Here is an artists rendering of the plane... note the bumps on the wings and the tail configuration.
![](http://sitelife.aviationweek.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/8/2/38c037ce-6d14-4cc2-92c1-47db5fd12842.Large.jpg)
36 posted on
12/01/2009 2:30:49 PM PST by
derekr44
To: Reaganesque
That is a model rocket plane.
37 posted on
12/01/2009 2:31:37 PM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson