Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

This thread is getting stale and I’m not sure how many are still following it.

One of the recurring questions from ardent palin supporters to those with questions is “Who would you vote for or support”? I’ve never treated this question seriously, besides it being a trap question (no matter whom you pick you will get mercilessly pounded by the Palinsistas) it’s still very early in the game and it would not be unusual for someone to not have chosen a preferred candidate yet. I have not, the none of the established candidates, including Palin, fill me with great confidence as of yet.

howver, I have given it much thought and come to a conclusion about whom, if they announced today, I could get behind comfortably.

Dick Cheney. Maybe a Dick and Liz team as well.


323 posted on 11/29/2009 8:59:20 AM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: Bob J

Oh, there you are. 324 please.


325 posted on 11/29/2009 9:01:15 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J

“One of the recurring questions from ardent Palin supporters to those with questions is “Who would you vote for or support”? I’ve never treated this question seriously, besides it being a trap question (no matter whom you pick you will get mercilessly pounded by the Palinsistas)”

You ask a trap question so you can pounce and then you state you won’t uncloth your candidate because it’s a trap question.

You are a joke. But you’re also the mouse and cat’s like to play.


326 posted on 11/29/2009 9:03:40 AM PST by rbmillerjr (It's us against them...the Establishment RINOs vs rank and file...Sarah Palin or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: All

Okay Palinistas, you have badgered and badgered me and now you have my answer.

So now you can proceed to tell me how Palin has more, experience, knowledge, insight, good instincts, composure under fire, interview presence, and most of all, CONSERVATIVE CREDENTIALS, than Dick Cheney.


327 posted on 11/29/2009 9:07:02 AM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J

Regarding your 323, you do realize that once the nomination is secured, there is no longer a Republican alternative behind whom you can throw your support, right? I wasn’t able to say, well, Hunter didn’t get the nomination in 2008, so I guess I’ll support Thompson. There was no Thompson or anyone else, except in the context of third party (who were without exception in 2008 all morons including Paul). My choice in 1976 was to support Ford against Carter, and then campaign for Reagan in 1980. Losing in 1976 didn’t stop Reagan in 1980.


329 posted on 11/29/2009 9:09:27 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson