Posted on 11/28/2009 6:19:36 AM PST by IbJensen
That’s actually a fascinating insight. Rather shows the difference; men marry a woman they love, cherish, care about and then proceed to use other women purely as toys.
If you reread what I posted, I said it was what the golf folks I know were saying. Not once did I claim it was true. Yet, you believe the Enquirer.
I wonder how this incident will affect property values in the neighbourhood!
An affair with a botox-lipped floozy? Where is this guy’s brain?
Apparently not between his ears... ;-)
Police arrived to find Woods, drifting in and out of consciousness, lying in the street with his wife watching over him, Saylor said.... “Get up, again, and I’ll scalp you with a nine iron, bitch!”
He should have stayed in the car.
LOL! I used that picture to describe how our team meetings were- with only one guy on the team.
Dumb move on her part (assuming this account is true). She could have walked away from this marriage with many millions, but this puts him in a position to dump her without paying her a dime and keep the kids.
LOL. Does that silhouette have a vertical rod in the middle so it can be used as a weather vane?
We must be related. I was just thinking the same thing.
You cant bash in the head of a cheatin’ man and expect to change things.
She is a beautiful woman, who would end up a rich beautiful woman. I wouldnt lower myself to deck any man..I would get him in the wallet..where it really hurts.
Well, Holmes, you make some good points, but it sounds like this case was assigned to Lestrade. It does seem odd that Woods could have suffered a significant head injury when backing out of the driveway, and that the wife would use a golf club to try to get him out of the car.
Gosh, we never suspected a thing. ;’) Thanks Perdogg!
http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/27/tiger-woods-fight-wife-crash-elin-nordegren/
“when he double-bogeyed the getaway” bwah-ha-hah!!!
LOLOLOL!
I dont think he was backing out. They said the damage was to the front of the car.
My guess is..big fight in the home. She gets physical, scratches him..he goes to leave, she goes for the club..he is pulling out..she is chasing the car, hitting it with the club..he is distracted, looking thru the rearview mirror..hits hydrant..bounces off and hits tree. He gets out..she whacks him in the mouth with the club (they claim he had bloody upper and lower lips)..and he is down for the count.
That sounds better to me, than he was going for milk and managed to just slam into two objects, while she was in the house. Why on earth would she have to smash a window to get him out of the car..if the airbags didnt even deploy?
He should have stayed in the car.
You object? Stop it? Mommy, make 'em stop! I only wish that Free Republic had such a critical mass of posters that we could make a difference in shaping public opinion. But this stuff is all over the internet so we're not spreading anything.
Interesting. This story is parallel to the story of Solomon and the two women who both claimed to be mother of the same baby. In that case the mother showed her true love of the baby by saving its life even if it meant giving up the baby.
But some informal research indicates that in this other situation many if not most women would opt having the lover killed rather than allowing another woman to have him.
Genetically speaking, both of these strategies make sense. But I think that many men would find feminine nature in the later case to be indicative of why women can not always be trusted with questions of morality or justice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.