Let's just address this one point, since you've charged me with it. Show me where I have ever made a single post that could even be remotely skewed as even mildly socialist? I'm nothing if not an avowed capitalist. I have never in my FR posting history advocated anything short of smaller government, lower taxes and the subsequent reductions in government spending. Your charge is thoroughly baseless, or an outright lie, only you know which one applies.
Being considered a socialist stems from your post after post after post on this thread that usurps the idea of fighting party dogma. It is you and your ilk who are promoting the success of Obama and the Democrats by supporting liberal Republicans who have no problem voting with them on anti-conservative issues.
You say you're a capitalist. Why should I believe you when the people you want us to support voted for the bailout, have voted for bigger and more oppressive government before the bailout came along, have lost an opportunity to take parliamentary measures insuring reading of the health legislation because they'd rather enjoy Thanksgiving Weekend at home, and in some cases have voted FOR such a intrusion on our civil rights? Why should I believe you?
Advocating is only one way to insure a policy is enforced. The other way is ambivalence. And that's what you display. Your continued support for anyone with an (R) after their name insures more of the same, until we will have lost it all. You may not believe in socialism, but you continue to rebuke anyone who's willing to fight. And that makes you a socialist by default. My charge is not baseless, and I am not lying when I say what I believe about you and your cohorts.