Seven lawsuits have already reached the US Supreme Court and they have rejected them all.
LOL Another joker with a net full of red herrings. Which is it? Did the SC hear one of these cases or did they send them back down to a lower court? It’s one or the other you can’t have it both ways.
You most certainly CAN have it both ways when talking about SEVEN different lawsuits and seven different legal decisions!
On the issue of Obama eligibility, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to grant a Writ of Certiorari (look it up if you don’t know what that means) in six of the cases and they sent one case (Berg v Obama et. al.) back to the US Court of Appeals because petitioner Berg had skipped that step and appealed directly to the Supremes. The US Court of Appeals then affirmed the dismissal of Berg’s suit.
In a typical year the US Supreme Court is asked to rule on between 8,000 and 10,000 cases and they typically “grant cert” in about 75 to 100 cases or 1 or 2 percent.
At the state appeals court level, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled about a week ago that Barack Hussein Obama and John Sidney McCain are both Natural Born Citizens under Article 2/Section 1 of the US Constitution. The case was Ankeney v Daniels. You can read their decision for yourself here:
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf
Whether that decision will be appealed to the federal courts remains to be seen.
Red herrings joker...out! ;-)
Which is it? Did the SC hear one of these cases or did they send them back down to a lower court? It's one or the other you can't have it both ways. It's neither. In each of the 9 eligibility cases to reach the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court denied certiorari, which means that the Supreme Court refused to hear the case and the decisions of the lower courts (which had all dismissed challenges to Obama's eligibility) stood. All 9 decisions were without a single recorded dissent.