To: dila813
bump for tomorrow- Are those IPCC researchers who admitted fraud current IPCC? Or are they ex-IPCC?
33 posted on
11/22/2009 11:17:05 PM PST by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: CottShop
That is the story title, what they are admitting is subject to interpretation.
34 posted on
11/22/2009 11:21:20 PM PST by
dila813
To: CottShop
From what I read it appears to me “they” are acknowledging the emails as legitimate, and the article’s authors are therefore accepting said acknowledgement as admission of fraud.
I could be wrong, but that’s what I think I read here.
39 posted on
11/23/2009 3:41:47 AM PST by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson