“Notwithstanding the courageous truthtellers we do have, the fact is that if the “scientific community” couldn’t even mount a campaign of truth aganst the likes of Algore, they won’t rise up en mass now.”
Many already have, but they were up against both the media and the government. With only a tiny fraction of the resources, it was easy to ignore or discount them.
This scandal will quite turn the tables. In addition, there was recent research published that definitively discredited the computer models used to promote CAGW.
I think I hear the fat lady warming up her voice in the distance... ;-)
Well yes I agree on that. I should have mentioned the media blackout as well. There was an expose' of IPCC's cooking the statistics in "Satanic Gasses" by Michaels and Balling way back in 2000. The media ignored it.
But where are the scientific and professional organizations? They are usually the means for "science" to speak to the public. AFAIK the only group which has stood up for empirical truth is the American Physics Association. The groups rfepresenting those who actually are supposed to study climate and atmospheric science are all coopted and passively or actively colluding with the fraud.
Speaking of computer models, one thing that may work against CAGW is the fact that we are in an anomalous sunspot cycle. (notice the gap between latest actual numbers, and the predicted red model curve)
As many know who have been following the sunspot threads, we have been in an abnormally long period of little/no sunspots. Sunspots are an indicator of solar activity, and in particular of the strength of the solar magnetic field. The solar magnetic field acts to shield the Earth from interstellar cosmic ray particles. Ionizing particles act to promote cloud formation. The net effect is a global cool down when the Sun's magnetic field weakens.